Survey capture & report writing
The specialist reporting platform held part of the job. Related information, review work and administration still had to be brought together elsewhere.
What started as a replacement for reporting and booking software has grown into a connected platform for the people, information and decisions behind every job.
Explore the workThe starting brief grew from understanding how Torus’s staff used their existing tools, how information moved through a job, and where people were filling the gaps between systems. Following the work revealed repeated data entry, underused features and manual workarounds that limited integration and poor support had left unresolved.
The specialist reporting platform held part of the job. Related information, review work and administration still had to be brought together elsewhere.
The booking and job-management system held another part. Its integration limits left the team connecting records, communications and follow-up work by hand.
The brief became: bring the useful functions together, improve how they work, and connect everything around them.
We developed the replacement reporting and job-management functions around shared client, property, job and document records. Information can move between the office, the surveyor and commercial work without rebuilding the same story in each place.
Prepare a quote and carry the checked details into the enquiry.
Unverified fees and exceptions need a manual quote.
Build the job record, prepare terms and plan the appointment.
Confirm the required terms and payment evidence.
Capture findings, photographs and costs against the same job.
Review incomplete capture and resolve sync conflicts.
Assemble the report and related schedules from shared information.
A responsible person reviews the exact version for issue.
Prepare commercial handoffs and keep outstanding actions visible.
Check totals, recipients and external completion separately.
A simplified view of the workflow. Terms, payment, delivery and invoicing follow linked tracks; they are not collapsed into one misleading “complete” status.
Email, calendars, accounting and messaging sit alongside the shared job workflow. Controlled handoffs distinguish what has been prepared, approved and completed. Warnings and review tasks keep failed or incomplete transfers visible, so a queued action is never mistaken for a completed one.
As we followed the real process, the scope expanded into the surrounding administration, people and commercial work. These are connected parts of the same platform.
Linked enquiries, clients, properties and jobs, with contacts, communications, queries, tasks and deadlines in context. Different services can follow different journeys without losing the shared record.
Versioned price schedules, checked quotations and terms with signing records. An unusual property or unverified price goes to manual quotation. Later price changes do not rewrite a checked quote.
Structured findings, photographs and cost lines feed report drafts and supporting schedules. Tablet capture, offline working and reviewed office handoffs connect the site visit to the finished document.
Surveyor allocation, qualifications, approved CV versions and leave requests sit alongside the work. Restricted pay arrangements and expense reviews support management and accounts preparation.
Agencies, branches and individual referrers have linked histories and fee records. A restricted partner view separates shared progress updates from internal notes, with checked fee batches for accounts.
Terms, payment, delivery and invoicing are tracked separately. Provisional bookings remain visibly provisional; preparing an invoice or payment handoff does not mark it as sent or paid.
Every Workflow100 client is assigned a named platform manager who looks after no more than five clients. They get to know your business and work alongside your team through development, maintenance and ongoing improvements.
How your platform manager works with you →
Saving time should not mean losing control. We have built explicit checks, manual routes and visible exceptions into the workflow.
Sending terms, issuing a report and preparing financial handoffs have explicit review points. The platform does the preparation; the responsible person makes the decision.
Missing prices trigger manual quotation. Incomplete fieldwork, conflicting changes and failed actions surface warnings and review work rather than quietly carrying on.
If a report changes after it has been reviewed for an email attachment, the stale action is rejected. The user must review the current revision before continuing.
Local encrypted recovery checkpoints can be compared with saved work. Conflicting edits require a choice, and recovery returns an unsaved draft for review—not an approved or issued report.
Document control is part of the workflow, from the original evidence to the document being reviewed and the version approved for use.
Original material is kept distinct from edited wording and working copies. Findings, photographs and costs stay linked, so the report and its supporting schedules draw on the same structured information.
Revision checks guard against overwriting newer work. A comparison PDF can highlight differences between selected earlier and revised reports, helping a reviewer inspect amendments.
Approved versions and issued-record snapshots preserve what was checked at that point. Later edits create new work to review rather than silently rewriting the original evidence.
The comparison tool is a review aid, not an approval decision. Selecting the correct source versions and approving professional outputs remain human responsibilities.
We will keep confidential data out of AI models. We design and test the software, using AI selectively with cleared briefs and fictional examples. The resulting tools can process records through ordinary code without sending them to an AI model.
Our approach to data protection & AIProfessional responsibilities shape the workflow. Data protection, confidentiality and professional requirements inform how records are accessed, retained and shared. Documented decisions and clear approval responsibilities keep these requirements connected to everyday work.
This approach follows the principle of considering both technical and organisational safeguards from the start. Read the ICO’s guidance ↗
The shared records and agreed controls create opportunities to connect more of Torus’s business. These are possible next steps to explore together.
Approved services, coverage areas and team profiles could feed the website from the platform. A publish preview and approval step would control updates, with a previous version available if something needs reversing.
Website enquiries and checked quote requests could enter the same client and job journey. Booking requests could use an approved view of capacity, with unusual work routed to a person before confirmation.
Clients could upload requested documents, see agreed progress updates and review deliverables in one place. Access would be limited to their own work, with internal notes and management records kept separate.
Combined workload, turnaround and commercial information could help management spot bottlenecks, plan recruitment and understand which services need attention—using agreed definitions and checked data.
Agreed milestones could prepare feedback requests, document reminders or repeat-service prompts, with contact preferences, timing and human exceptions built into the rules.